The Novato Sanitary District (NSD) Board and management are trying to privatize your wastewater operations. This is bad for Novato!


Privatization will mean loss of local control for Novato and profits will leave our community.

Communities across the Bay Area, the state, and the country have been rapidly leaving privatization and returning to full public control because it has been harmful for their communities! Recent returns to public control include Petaluma and Fairfield-Suisun. This is a fight that can be won, citizens of Stockton coalesced into the Concerned Citizens Coalition of Stockton and successfully fought off the large conglomerate, OMI-Thames, and their own mayor to retain full control of their wastewater and water this year. Residents who have regularly attended NSD Board meetings have never been allowed an appropriate public process to discuss the issue of privatization and its impact on Novatoans.  Additionally residents have repeatedly requested an independent review panel to evaluate and analyze the District’s report that justifies the privatization option.  Their requests have had no sincere responses.  One board member even inquired with their attorney as to whether or not the board even had to listen to public comment. There is a complete and total lack of transparency. While claiming they are investigating all options for running the new plant, NSD has launched a PR campaign with mailings and websites touting the superiority of the privatization option.


The privatization of water utilities or services has generated:

  • Concerns about:
    • Implications for water quality, environmental values, public health, and local job security;
    • Requirements for adequate contract supervision;
    • Uncertain control during emergencies;
    • Loss of some degree of control over a vital public service;
    • Loss of expertise, which would make reversal of operations difficult; and
    • Lack of public access to important information about water utilities.
  • Conflicts between short-term profit maximization and long-term needs to protect infrastructure and natural resources.
  • Strong public opposition to privatization proposals from private water companies because of the concern that privatization discourages natural resources conservation efforts; jeopardizes quality of services and leads to rate hikes; and, decreases direct accountability to the public and reduces government influence.

Privatization discourages natural resources conservation efforts.

  • A corporation’s chief goal is to make a profit, which is often invested into new projects or simply pocketed rather than used to conserve natural resources like water. Since maximizing profits often means encouraging increased consumption, it may not be in the interest of water corporations to promote water conservation.
  • If a private operator has purchased a municipality’s water-related assets, they may include the municipality’s watershed areas as well as industrial equipment. In order to maximize revenue, the operator may want to either develop the watershed area, which is considered surplus to its supply needs, or sell it off to others for development

Privatization jeopardizes quality of services and leads to rate hikes.

  • Private water suppliers may have few economic incentives to address long-term health problems associated with low levels of some pollutants. The profit motive may provide incentives to cut corners on long-term investments and reduce efforts to monitor water quality.
  • Rates have increased in many U.S. communities where water has been privatized, disproportionately affecting low-income families and small business owners. In Pekin, Illinois, rates increased 204 percent over the 18 years that Illinois-American, a subsidiary of American Water Works, ran the water system.

Privatization decreases direct accountability to the public and reduces government influence.

  • Private sector workers who deliver public services are directly accountable to their company – not to citizens; consequently, citizens’ ability to hold public officials and workers responsible for the quality and timeliness of public services is reduced.
  • Once water services are privatized, local governments may lack the influence needed to ensure that water quality and pollution standards are met and to penalize corporations who fail to meet them. Weaknesses in monitoring progress can lead to ineffective service provision, discriminatory behavior, or violations of water quality protections.

ACCNovato needs your help! Attend the next Novato Sanitary District Board meeting on Monday, July 29th, at 6:30 p.m. located at Hill Community Room, 1560 Hill Rd., Novato, behind the Margaret Todd Senior Center. Demand the board delay a decision on privatization provide for a more inclusive public review of the contract operations and maintenance proposals. The more people we have speak, the easier it will be to get the people's point across to the board; up to now they have ignored us - we need them to listen. Map to this NSD Board Meeting (opens in new window)


ACCNovato Highlighted Media:

The Commonwealth Club of California (the nation's oldest and largest public affairs forum have Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow discuss:

   The Privatization of Water (FORA TV - opens in new window) - This is a must see!!!!

To learn more visit our Resources page.


View the Timeline to Privatization (word document):

As Novato residents, we need to stop the district from bringing in a French corporation to make a profit off of our public utility. Here is how you can help!



S
P
A
C
E
R

S

A

V

E

-

O

U

R

-

S

E

W

E

R

S

 

S

A

V

E

-

O

U

R

-

S

E

W

E

R

S

 

S

A

V

E

-

O

U

R

-

S

E

W

E

R

S